I'm tired of explaining to these people that there is absolutely no danger of child marriage being legalised anytime soon. Relationships that would now be described as "pedophilia" used to be normal and commonplace across all cultures, but it is now strongly stigmatised and illegal in most cultures. That's the complete reverse of what has happened with attitudes to homosexuality.

It's gone the other way. Why? Because people have woke up and noticed that there is a victim in one and no victim in the other, and they had it the wrong way round before.

I mean.... like we're just going sit back and allow child marriages because "whoops the law says so now, nothing we can do". The law does not rule us, we make the law.

And clearly, the law does not say so now, contrary to the ridiculous predictions.

(August 7, 2015 at 10:18 am)Ace Wrote:

(August 7, 2015 at 10:00 am)Neimenovic Wrote: Back up this assertion about marriages with animals:


I'm not speaking for Redbeard. You ask him. If there is something I've stated you feel I should give a citation for, tell me. Otherwise, leave everyone else out of it, because we are not a hivemind.

http://www.allthingscrimeblog.com/2013/0...-marriage/

http://www.motherjones.com/rights-stuff/...-sex-legal

http://hastingswomenslj.org/journal/2014...mebzcse7va

marriages with animals. Marriages.

(August 7, 2015 at 10:17 am)robvalue Wrote: It was clearly being implied that you can't legalize gay marriage without also legalizing child marriage. Of course "removing the age restriction" would legalize child marriage, by definition. That has nothing to do with gay marriage, as I've been saying from the start.

Yea ok , but I dont think the post that were put up were sitll arguing that. But I could be wrong. Like I said Iwas just posting a reply to the current posts.

(August 7, 2015 at 10:17 am)robvalue Wrote: it's Anima slowly building up to wanting to create his own version of an Aryan race. Stopping gays getting married was just a way to piss in their face because he can't round them all up; with lots of legal flapping to act as rationalizations that clearly came to nothing. Why you're supporting him, I have no idea. Do you want gays rounded up too?

Because you guy are acting like little kids who first heard a swear word, stupid. . . . . Really? your really going to act that ignorant? . . . For the millionth time - - -[i] it was a fake argument[/i]! come on man.


Anima Wrote:
(29th June 2015, 17:00)
Those are cursory argument devoid of proper details.  Which would you like to argue?

Aristocatt
29th June 2015, 17:12 (This post was last modified: 29th June 2015, 17:17 by Aristocatt.)
Happy to debate either. . .but just for fun:

The level of this discussion has become so absurd and desperate I'm not sure it's worth continuing. I really hope Anima is playing with us, I shudder to think what a real person holding these opinions would be like.

Err... right. You're saying Anima doesn't really mean anything he is saying? Maybe he should answer that question. If you're not in fact his brother or friend, you seem to speak for him a lot.

I asked him point blank about exterminating gays, and he said he would do it. No fake argument there.

(August 7, 2015 at 10:38 am)robvalue Wrote: Err... right. You're saying Anima doesn't really mean anything he is saying?

I can't speak for him, but I do know it was a fake set up argument. However, he did say he was way to lazy to kill anyone, so.

(August 7, 2015 at 10:38 am)robvalue Wrote: If you're not in fact his brother or friend, you seem to speak for him a lot.

Hey, your brought him up, not me. . . .yes, yes, yes, we are aline brothers, friends from the 3rd dimension, whatever.  You seem to speak against him a lot, you could be his contract kill or conspiring to do him harm.

(August 7, 2015 at 10:38 am)robvalue Wrote: I asked him point blank about exterminating gays, and he said he would do it. No fake argument there.

Umm yea right, because you made it know that it was a personal question by saying - - - aside from this argument what do you really think?  No you did not. Within the argument you said so you would exterminate gays.
[/quote]

Wow...

Anima is talking about exterminating gays, and I'm the one you're worried about looking to kill someone?

You said you can't speak for him, and then you just did, again.

I think we're done. Goodbye.

(August 7, 2015 at 10:23 am)Yeauxleaux Wrote: I but it is now strongly stigmatised and illegal in most cultures.

If only that were completely true. We can only hope that it is stopped completely some how.

(August 7, 2015 at 10:57 am)robvalue Wrote: Wow...

Anima is talking about exterminating gays, and I'm the one you're worried about looking to kill someone?

You said you can't speak for him, and then you just did, again.

I think we're done.

Hahaha really, . . .wow . . .ok,I can't have my option on the matter, which is all that was. And the statement was not about Ainma, it was about me and address to me in regards to a "relationship" of some sort. So that little comparison . . "Anima is talking about exterminating gays, and I'm the one you're worried about looking to kill someone"? . . .you made there has nothing to do what we were talking about.

Anima did say that if in the end all does not work, then killing would be used. However, I do wonder how you were going to 'fix' the overpopulation situation in the world.

I'm sorry man. You are probably trying your best, but everything you said just contradicted everything you said before. I could go through step by step but... this is just going to keep happening. No hard feelings, but I'm going to leave it.