(August 7, 2015 at 3:56 pm)Yeauxleaux Wrote:(August 7, 2015 at 3:43 pm)Redbeard The Pink Wrote: Informed consent. Informed consent. INFORMED FUCKING CONSENT!!!If they still don't get the difference by this point, they're fucking stupid.
How many times does this have to be repeated? It is truly worrying that religious sorts have such a balk over this shit, especially as it pertains to children.
"a child can give consent at age 10" did I really read that earlier? WTF. What 10 year old even knows about sex and if they do, what have their parents been telling them?
1. Informed consent is generally only applicable to medical procedures and is not used in consenting to the application of fundamental rights.
2. Informed consent is generally determined according to common law rules of consent and is distinguished from regular consent in terms of a recording of the consent in documentation containing terms and results of the acts to be performed. Also know as a contract, which is to be signed by the parties involved.
Meaning informed consent is not some kind of special ultra mega consent. It is simply express written consent that is recorded to satisfy the Statute of Frauds rather than implicit consent given by conduct. Now as we have stated already marriage is under contract law and a child may enter into a contract, especially contracts for necessaries that convey and dignity and security to the child. Meaning a child may give INFORMED CONSENT!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informed_consent
So if you still cannot get the difference at this point, are you fucking stupid?