(August 8, 2015 at 2:31 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(August 8, 2015 at 2:27 am)Exian Wrote: I think that may be the biggest difference with our definitions of morality. Yours has a definitive right and wrong answer based soley on what the bible says, while mine strives for the least negative/most positive possible outcome for the most people, based on empathy, theory of mind, and an unspoken societal agreement.
Lol, that was a very unbiased way of putting it...
Haha Yeah, I see what your saying. I'll add this, sometimes what your bible deems morally good is best for the most, but that's partly due to dumb luck and because it was written by people with empathy, theory of mind, and who lived in a society. Maybe a better way of putting it would be your morals are written in black and white, while mine have the ability to move into grey areas when it's called for.
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
