(August 10, 2015 at 2:41 pm)Neimenovic Wrote:(August 10, 2015 at 2:18 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: ...And that is exactly the gap between me and the rest of you, and why it is difficult for you to understand my views.
You think "a penis in a vagina" is just some little thing that you can compare to the color of a pill. We think it's an incredibly sacred, holy, spiritual thing.
No, I don't think that, but thanks for telling me that I do. I think picking under what circumstances it is moral to impregnate a consenting woman to be equal to picking the color of a pill.
Why? Is rape sacred too?
You know, this is precisely the attitude towards sex that I detest. Making it something like blasphemy if it isn't in the right circumstances, and the right circumstances are two married people of opposite sexes. Because reasons.
My apologies. I misunderstood and thought you did when you made the comment about penis in vagina and color of pill.
And no, rape is not sacred. Rape defiles a sacred act. On top of being a horrible thing to do to another person (which alone would be enough to make it immoral), we believe rape is immoral also because it takes something so sacred and defiles it.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
