(August 10, 2015 at 6:22 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(August 10, 2015 at 2:34 pm)Clueless Morgan Wrote: If a thing like human life is sacred despite the morality of the method of conception, then what purpose does distinguishing between the morality of the methods of conception have? Why make the distinction? Why does it matter whether a child is conceived through a loving sex act, or a violent one, or through medical intervention if the end result is still a "sacred" child?
Like I said, we think it's immoral to take something holy outside the purity of its context. And to us, that's what IVF does.
So then you're just committing the naturalistic fallacy.
Teenaged X-Files obsession + Bermuda Triangle episode + Self-led school research project = Atheist.