RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
August 11, 2015 at 10:56 pm
(July 15, 2015 at 5:29 am)Pandæmonium Wrote:Not one iota of a scientific counterpoint which again re-enforces my contention that atheists (at least posting atheists) really don't know science, yet they think it's so wonderful (well, after all, science is actually the study of how God did it). So here's a question: Why don't the atheists that know science post? My conclusion: once they know science, they are no longer atheists.(July 15, 2015 at 1:56 am)snowtracks Wrote: A ‘brilliant evolutionist biologist”, well not exactly. When asked what was the Origin of Life his answer is ‘was the first replicating molecule’,* then the question: how did that happen? Answer he doesn’t know. (could have originated from another civilization somewhere in the universe). --- it’s those stupid aliens again. To have replication capabilities, complex systems need to be operational with DNA coding completely functional. *time 2:55
More tripe. I'd be willing to listen to your critique of Dawkins (who is a brilliant evolutionary biologist), however, as demonstrated through this thread, you're about as literate in scientific discourse and education as I am in Klingon. Listening to you would be the equivalent of asking a 2 year old her opinion on the use of the gold standard. And whilst illiteracy on a subject doesn't of course detract from the points made, you have continually failed to make any points worthy of critique.
Case in point. Intellectual honesty appears to be something that has sailed you by through your formative years in education. "I don't know" is the only honest answer when asked a question you can't give a valid and evidenced answer to. Speculation can only get you so far.
Oh, and just in case you were any under illusion that anyone here is taking you seriously, I'd like to point out another blunder in your attempted but obvious equivocation to evolution and abiogensis/origin of life. Either try reading up on the subjects you're talking about, or stay silent. Oh, and let's not even forget that you still haven't answered any of the critiques about your bizarre thesis about atheism and science, a s though they are entities and are somehow in cahoots.
P 'tak
PS - Many take me seriously and can't wait for me to post again or wouldn't post in response, so don't be under a false illusion, and some don't. Either way, it has nothing to do with the price of apples.
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.