\Napoléon Wrote:If he doesn't believe in a god, it's not at all rude to point out that he actually meets the description for such a word that accurately describes such a thing.
In the video he clearly states his definition of agnosticism as doesn't know because of lack of evidence but will embrace any evidence if it turns up. Also, if it's not there he's not forced to think something that is not supported. So, he hasn't actually stated he doesn't believe in any kind of Supreme Being or claiming that he knows for a fact that there's no Supreme Being.
\Napoléon Wrote:- Agnosticism and atheism aren't mutually exclusive, we all know this.
People have come up with various categories of agnostics and atheists and yes, some of the categories do overlap.
\Napoléon Wrote: By all means he can call himself what he likes, and identify as what he likes.
He identifies himself as an agnostic - someone who doesn't know. That's why I think it's rude for Wikipedia authors to say he's an atheist when he identifies himself as being an agnostic.
Where are the snake and mushroom smilies?