(August 16, 2015 at 1:03 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:(August 16, 2015 at 12:41 pm)IATIA Wrote: And what of King Arthur? Merlin? I have sources/books for those also.
Yes, I was thinking of them, also.
Would you say that professional historians believe that King Arthur really existed? What is their consensus?
That there may have been a historical Arthur. There was certainly a real battle in which he was supposed to have fought. There is also a carving dating to the correct period in history that bears the words Arcturis which was the romano british word for Arthur. However there is in sufficient evidence to prove that a Romano British ruler actually existed of that name and even if he did exist a lot of supernatural elements have been added later. Seem familiar.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.