Morality is like a religion

[robvalue]

What I'm saying is that a scientific theory should make some sort of predictions, so it can be tested. Yours appears to define words in such a way as to reach an inevitible conclusion. If a theory (or more properly a hypothesis) doesn't make any predictions that can be tested, or have some other way to falsify it, then it can't be a scientific theory. It's just an assumption/tautology.

Are you asking us to discuss the way you define words? That's the only thing I can think of to "test" it. Otherwise I agree that by your definitions, your conclusion is correct. I just don't see that we've learned anything useful on the way.

But again, I'm shit today.