There can be no posteriori proof of the non-existence of many gods, like the ones who conveniently leave no traces of their interaction, don't answer prayers when anyone's studying it, give many different and contradictory "spiritual" experiences to billions of people since the dawn of many, are defined outside of the universe etc. It's only empirically substantial concepts that can be falsified, and not this intellectually spineless ad-hoc theism you lot seem to cling to.
The only way the vast majority of gods can be disproved is priori, and that is because they are either self-refuting or incoherent. The omni god, when the omni set is used as defined and not just as "has all logically consistent power, knowledge and presence" etc, cannot possibly exist because when some of the omni attributes are combined as actually defined they are simply self-refuting concepts, riddled in paradox.
The only way the vast majority of gods can be disproved is priori, and that is because they are either self-refuting or incoherent. The omni god, when the omni set is used as defined and not just as "has all logically consistent power, knowledge and presence" etc, cannot possibly exist because when some of the omni attributes are combined as actually defined they are simply self-refuting concepts, riddled in paradox.
.
