(August 29, 2015 at 10:30 am)Neimenovic Wrote:(August 29, 2015 at 10:28 am)ChadWooters Wrote: I'd like to hear you try to prove that assertion without referencing some a priori principle.
Would you like to hear why Bigfoot must exist? I can prove he exists without any tangible evidence, by using half assed arguments. That makes him real.
You can try if you like, but first I am calling your bluff. Prove that you can demonstrate the existence of anything without making any a priori assumptions.