RE: Anti gay-marriage atheist??
August 30, 2015 at 10:31 pm
(This post was last modified: August 30, 2015 at 10:39 pm by Pyrrho.)
My wife would not care that much if I had such a video. Come to think of it, I do have a movie that does have such scenes in the full version, though not, I think, in the pre-release version of the film, which is supposed to be better (not "better" for those of you who want to watch pornography, but better as a cinematic work). However, I have not yet watched the discs I acquired. It is this, if anyone is curious. It is on a shelf with other movies I have, and my wife is fully aware of its existence and has a good idea of what is on the discs, even though we have not yet watched them. I have several films that are unrated, but I think that is the only movie I have that has hardcore pornography in it. And that is not why I got it. I want to see the pre-release version of the film. I will probably at some point watch the pornographic version as well, but I have had it a while and I still have not gotten around to it. It would not be surprising if I still have not watched either version, or any of the extras on the third disc, during the next year either. But, someday, I expect to watch at least the pre-release version and maybe an extra about it. Tinto Brass (the director of the pre-release version without the pornography that was added by Bob Guccione) was, I think, interviewed for this and it will be interesting to hear what he has to say about it. If my memory of the story of this is correct, Bob Guccione fired Tinto Brass from the project, re-edited the film and added hardcore pornography to it. That is why the original released version is a bit of a mess. And why the pre-release version is probably much better as a story. But, I have not seen the pre-release version and am going by what I have read on the subject.
"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
