(August 31, 2015 at 2:27 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(August 31, 2015 at 1:55 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: What cases are those?
Pretty much anything that is illegal or legal but not socially acceptable but would require someone to refrain from acting on deep seeded desires/parts of themselves.
I am reluctant to give examples because then people will just be like "omg, you're comparing ____ to homosexual sex!" Which is not what I'm doing at all. I'm merely pointing out that there are instances where all of us, as a society, believe a person should deny huge parts of themselves. Not that the behaviors themselves are similar in any way. But Esq made it sound like it's wrong in general to believe a person should ever do this, so I wanted clarification.
But if you think there is a class of people who are not deserving of fulfillment in this life because of a basic flaw in their make up .. that does sound pretty bigoted to me. I'm quite sure you'd still donate a kidney to them if your gay friend asked but it still seems like a pretty qualified sort of acceptance.
