Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 14, 2025, 6:53 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here.
#9
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here.
Yes.

And what's interesting is in the first chapter of The Blind Watchmaker that Dawkins treats robots and man-made things as biological objects because they couldn't exist without people which ARE bilogical objects. And that's why these man-made things are more complex than rocks for example.

ALthough of course they're not REALLY biological objects, but he says "Words are our servants, not our masters" and in the matter of complexity - treating them as biological objects helps explain. Since they're more complex than just any other non-biological objects since they are made by humans rather than just occuring in nature.

If you saw complex robots on an alien planet you may think that they were created by biological aliens or something.

But if you see just a bunch of rocks it doesn't imply any complex life.

Non-biological things that are made BY biological things (us humans for example) tend to be more complex than just any other non-biological things.

But they are still not as complex as the biological things that made them. At least - not yet. Maybe one day if computers and robots get complex enough they can get a snowball effect (the faster it goes the bigger it gets the faster it goes the bigger it gets, etc) and surpass us perhaps. I dunno.

But, not yet.

EvF
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by Ephrium - February 21, 2009 at 10:33 am
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by leo-rcc - February 21, 2009 at 12:25 pm
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by Ephrium - February 22, 2009 at 6:17 am
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by DD_8630 - February 22, 2009 at 10:22 am
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by Edwardo Piet - February 22, 2009 at 12:44 pm
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by DD_8630 - February 22, 2009 at 4:30 pm
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by Ephrium - February 23, 2009 at 3:23 am
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by Tiberius - February 23, 2009 at 11:36 am
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by Ephrium - February 24, 2009 at 1:55 am
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by allan175 - February 24, 2009 at 11:41 am
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by leo-rcc - February 24, 2009 at 6:29 am
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by DD_8630 - February 24, 2009 at 2:43 pm
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by leo-rcc - February 24, 2009 at 3:54 pm
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by DD_8630 - February 24, 2009 at 6:46 pm
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by DD_8630 - February 24, 2009 at 9:41 pm
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by leo-rcc - February 25, 2009 at 5:18 am
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by DD_8630 - February 27, 2009 at 11:54 pm
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by lukec - February 22, 2009 at 7:29 pm
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by lukec - February 23, 2009 at 4:07 am
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by Meatball - February 24, 2009 at 10:58 am
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by leo-rcc - February 24, 2009 at 7:23 pm
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by Ephrium - February 25, 2009 at 1:22 am
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by DD_8630 - February 25, 2009 at 5:19 am
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by Tiberius - February 25, 2009 at 12:38 pm
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by Ephrium - February 27, 2009 at 9:05 am
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by leo-rcc - February 27, 2009 at 9:41 am
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by Tiberius - February 27, 2009 at 12:18 pm
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by Ephrium - February 28, 2009 at 9:10 am
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by lukec - February 27, 2009 at 4:35 pm
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by DD_8630 - February 28, 2009 at 8:03 am
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by DD_8630 - February 28, 2009 at 11:37 am
RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here. - by lukec - February 28, 2009 at 2:41 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is my argument against afterlife an equivocation fallacy? FlatAssembler 61 6919 June 20, 2023 at 5:59 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Argumentum ad Ignorantium Fallacy Agnostico 49 8499 March 18, 2019 at 9:40 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Common Sense shows religion screws people up. Usalabs 11 3713 March 20, 2017 at 12:34 am
Last Post: SuperSentient
  Atheists who have never read common atheist literature ComradeMeow 68 13383 March 2, 2017 at 4:46 pm
Last Post: Cephus
  How would you respond to these common theist statements? TheMonster 21 6497 July 5, 2015 at 8:20 pm
Last Post: Regina
  Schooling on Facebook with Common Sesnse dyresand 11 4038 March 31, 2015 at 4:47 pm
Last Post: Clueless Morgan
  Atheism and Small Towns Vox Populi 14 3281 February 28, 2015 at 2:33 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  One Small Step For Life, One Giant Leap For Understanding LivingNumbers6.626 6 4013 July 28, 2014 at 2:28 pm
Last Post: LivingNumbers6.626
  Theist fallacy A_Nony_Mouse 1 1350 March 31, 2013 at 5:44 am
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  A Small Census rexbeccarox 157 48618 March 13, 2013 at 1:52 am
Last Post: Whateverist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)