(September 20, 2015 at 5:32 am)abaris Wrote: I didn't look any further than Scientific Accuracy for the bible. Clear? On what grounds?
Fulfilled Prophecy. Clear? Well, since there are people believing Nostradamus to be accurate, we can chalk this point up to makebelief.
Archeological findings? What exactly? On what grounds does archeology support the bible. Unless it's only about the society of the time. Please, don't bring up the Pilate stone or anything onn that lines. That Pilate was a real person doesn't do anything to proving the bible.
Usual bullshittery, delivered with pseudo science and pseudo evidence.
And on a side note, you should take a good hard look at the 30/30 rule.
And I just absolutely love this.You just gave me a whole bunch of question's
let me confirm that to you.
What are the fulfilled prophecy that prove the Bible?
What are the archaeological findings and how do they support the Bible?
What is the scientific support of the Bible?
