Evidence: The Gathering

[abaris]

This is a valid point. However, since they are so apt to engage in this kind of sophistry (by playing on the presumption of most people about how the system works, when the reality is much more complex), I am willing to engage them on those terms. The courtroom standards are sadly lax, even under the best of circumstances... and even so, their "evidence" falls horrifyingly short.

No, history is the standard to engage his claims. History is an international system and what he claims has no base in that discipline. He's demonstrated again and again that he hasn't got any clue when it comes to history. For references look up some of my old posts when I still considered it a valid endeavor to engage him on that.

He's just going back to his old courtroom shtick although I already owned him on that. It's not worth the effort to engage him on anything. That guy is just a sleazy phony.