(November 23, 2010 at 4:17 pm)theVOID Wrote: Nature as you have described here is incompatible with the other picture of "nature" and "super-nature"; Their boundaries are usually defined by the presence or lack of material interaction.Interesting, so that would mean certain aspects of the universe could potentially be "unnatural" as well.

Quote:You assume all things that exist (are things) are products of a creation.Not quite, nothing still exists (but by nothing I should have referenced the nothing of physics). True nonetheless though. It's a fallacious argument, the only time I've actually used it was to show the flawed reasoning behind the uncreated creator/first cause scenario.
Quote:The burden of proof is yoursAnd I've gotten nowhere in disproving leprechauns, wendigos, furies, wizards, goblins, invisible flying ninja robot monkeys, or Darth Vader.


"Faith is about taking a comforting, childlike view of a disturbing and complicated world." ~ Edward Current
![[Image: Invisible_Pink_Unicorn_by_stampystampy.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i140.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fr39%2FPanicxButton2%2FInvisible_Pink_Unicorn_by_stampystampy.gif)
![[Image: 91b7ba0967f80c8c43c58fdf3fa0571a.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i140.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fr39%2FPanicxButton2%2F91b7ba0967f80c8c43c58fdf3fa0571a.gif)
![[Image: Secular_Humanist_by_MaruLovesStamps.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i140.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fr39%2FPanicxButton2%2FSecular_Humanist_by_MaruLovesStamps.gif)