(November 23, 2010 at 4:17 pm)theVOID Wrote: Nature as you have described here is incompatible with the other picture of "nature" and "super-nature"; Their boundaries are usually defined by the presence or lack of material interaction.Interesting, so that would mean certain aspects of the universe could potentially be "unnatural" as well.

Quote:You assume all things that exist (are things) are products of a creation.Not quite, nothing still exists (but by nothing I should have referenced the nothing of physics). True nonetheless though. It's a fallacious argument, the only time I've actually used it was to show the flawed reasoning behind the uncreated creator/first cause scenario.
Quote:The burden of proof is yoursAnd I've gotten nowhere in disproving leprechauns, wendigos, furies, wizards, goblins, invisible flying ninja robot monkeys, or Darth Vader.
Nor have I proven that I am indeed, not God. What burdens I have...
"Faith is about taking a comforting, childlike view of a disturbing and complicated world." ~ Edward Current




