(November 23, 2010 at 4:17 pm)theVOID Wrote: Nice try, but your running into trouble in places.Thank you for the forensic dismantling of my sylolgisms. I braindumped rather than thinking this through, but I glad someone did (and for that matter did a better job than me). Clearly you're right, evidential disproofs often carry the burden of the problem of induction, hence evidential conclusions should probably state 'probably'. Of the logical disproofs there are so many and whilst they give deductive conclusions, they are mostly subject to theological 'ah but' becuase the god concept can be morphed into any shape the theologian wants to make the refutation work. Are you convinced by any logical disproofs?
"I still say a church steeple with a lightning rod on top shows a lack of confidence"...Doug McLeod.
