RE: Ron Paul poised to take on the Fed at head of financial subcommittee
November 29, 2010 at 7:27 pm
I frankly don't see why this 200 year old piece of legislation is held in such high regard, as a historical president it was a first, but defending an idea "because it's in the constitution" seems completely arbitrary, a much more effective system is a pragmatic one like we have here where laws are judged by their consequences and achievements and not a conservative one where the aging legislation is defended at (almost) all costs.
Keep the good parts, throw out the parts that are antiquated, clear up any confusion etc.
Keep the good parts, throw out the parts that are antiquated, clear up any confusion etc.
.