RE: Why the "There are so many interpretations of the Bible" claim is confused
October 7, 2015 at 12:12 pm
(October 6, 2015 at 11:51 pm)Delicate Wrote: A common claim about Christianity is "There are so many interpretations of the Bible! How can you know if any of it is true!"
What people who make this claim don't realize is that the differences over interpretation account for a minuscule fraction of what the Bible really says. So, while the Bible's stance on certain issues might not be wholly precise, the main claims are pretty clear.
For instance, it's pretty clear, not just from the Bible, but from historical record, that there was a man named Jesus. The Bible is pretty clear about most of his claims, and the basic facts of his life, etc.
The problem with people who make this claim is the overly broad and inaccurate generalizations.
The vast majority of discovered Biblical texts are for the most part identical to each other, and the minor discrepancies that do exist are over things like grammar and prepositions (like "on" versus "upon").
What knowledgeable atheists can rationally affirm is that only certain parts of the Bible might be ambiguous. The others are more or less clear.
Implications of your claim that the Bible is accurate save for afew *minor* discrepancies;
-Gods cool with incest
-Gods cool with slavery
-Gods cool with genocide
-Gods cool with human sacrifice
-Gods cool with"vicarious redemption", identical to human sacrifice
-Gods cool with women being property
Do you think maybe if the Bible is accurate and literal that you might have bigger problems?
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
- Abdul Alhazred.