Why the "There are so many interpretations of the Bible" claim is confused

[Esquilax]

I say "if' for your benefit, if we as Christians are correct in what we believe then Dawkins is calling millions to an eternal punishment, a punishment far worse than wiping out mankind. Dawkins teaches people in the way of their punishment. If we're right then Dawkins is your enemy.

GC

So... wait. Does anyone else spot the enormous flaw in the argument here?

If christians are correct then Dawkins is advocating for a viewpoint that will send people to hell, making him the enemy. If christians are correct then god exists, and is far more complicit in sending people to hell than Dawkins is, and that makes him... good?

Not to mention, "a punishment far worse than wiping out mankind," GC? You mean something morally worse than a thing your ultimate moral guide literally did?