RE: Why the "There are so many interpretations of the Bible" claim is confused
October 8, 2015 at 4:15 pm
(October 8, 2015 at 12:51 am)Godschild Wrote:(October 7, 2015 at 10:12 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: 7. Dawkins has neither committed genocide nor commanded people to commit genocide.
I say "if' for your benefit, if we as Christians are correct in what we believe then Dawkins is calling millions to an eternal punishment, a punishment far worse than wiping out mankind. Dawkins teaches people in the way of their punishment. If we're right then Dawkins is your enemy.
GC
Isn't there an "Anti-Pascal's Wager" filter that can be installed on this site?
Seriously, GC, after how long you've been here, that you are still unable to see the flaws in this argument, is pretty disappointing. But pretty predictable.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
