(October 9, 2015 at 12:43 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: So you interpret countless hours of conversation concerning flaws on a faith position that governs alot of peoples worldviews to be not starting the conversation...
No.
(October 9, 2015 at 12:43 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: and thus a faith position?
Not a position of an "active" faith.
(October 9, 2015 at 12:43 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: I'm not even sure what the relation between the first part concerning that book on neuroscience and this notion is.
Not a book on neuroscience.
(October 9, 2015 at 12:43 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: Alright, the human mind is capable of imagining things that less intelligent animals cannot... so? How does that backup your position?
Simulation of deep future is not simply imagination.
(October 9, 2015 at 12:43 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: Also you "believe" its a construct of the third? So he doesn't actually say it is, does he. Thats something you've added on. Even if this is the case it would seem a mistake to pin faith down to just one level of consciousness as its a position that makes claims about, and I can't stress this enough, everything. Where you are in space, your position in society and your future.
I'm the living word of Gwynnite, he's Michio Kaku
(October 9, 2015 at 12:43 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: There is no obvious relation between what you've presented and your conclusion.
This needs more padding out.
The conjecture is to see faith in terms of being an aspect of the ability to simulate future.
