(October 11, 2015 at 12:10 pm)Randys brother Wrote:(October 11, 2015 at 11:56 am)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: You're citing WOOD!? For fuck's sake, man. Wood has been disproved handily, and by Christian scholars!Christian scholars! if they did within belief then it's fine.
Come ON with that shit! http://www.biblicalchronologist.org/answ...ntwood.php
And you're right, Patheos is not an atheist website. I mistook it for something else.
This site is still not against the archaeology of the bible but just correcting the dating,and I don't trust carbon dating.
Bolding mine.
Ok, so either you are admitting that you don't understand the physics behind dating techniques, or you are lying. Why lying? Because if you came across an article concerning some archaeological find yielding physical evidence that you thought supported your reading of the Bible and its historicity, and that support was based on dating techniques, I'd bet the fucking mortgage payment that your skepticism regarding carbon dating would go right out the window.
Christians: gullible most of the time; skeptics only when it suits their purposes; dishonest to the core.