(October 20, 2015 at 4:22 am)I_am_not_mafia Wrote: If an action is not performed in life and without faith but is inspired by God then that action by necessity is not an action. It is the illusion of an action. It is nothing more than a concept albeit one with negative utility. But if you have a life and do not perform actions then how can you have faith in God? We have two completely contradictory cases here which means that the two cases are simultaneously mutually exclusive yet complementary. The level of faith that you have is indirectly inversely proportional to your position in action-space that you inhabit cross linked by your belief in God's greatness. Which means that if you in any way perform any actions whatsoever then your belief in God must be an illusion. Therefore the more you try to prove your faith the less chance there is that God exists.
I largely agree, but I have to comment on some details which I think you got completely wrong here. Two mutually exclusive cases are complementary in action-space precisely because they, on a meta-level, are linked by God's greatness. Faith in this way helps transgress the boundary of negation and establishes the existence of God on a semantic level as an constructionist author-fiction relationship.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
