(October 20, 2015 at 2:52 am)Whateverist the White Wrote:(October 3, 2015 at 4:50 pm)Delicate Wrote: Thus, atheists cannot escape absolute truths, on any level.
If there are any absolute truths, why would we want to escape them?
But what really does "absolute" add to "truth". Truth is simply a concept regarding the fit between language and the state of affairs it describes. Truth is already contingent on the correct use of the language so that it correctly maps to the way things stand. I simply don't understand what additional condition must be met in order for a bit of language to be not just the truth but also the "absolute" truth. Is this a coherent idea? I don't get it.
Sometimes you must add qualifiers to express the severity of your conviction!
EG: If I say "Do you love me?", and then say "Do you REALLY love me? (whilst dropping my pants)", there is a subtle, I know, but distinct difference ...
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Know God, Know fear.