RE: Proof for being an atheist
October 20, 2015 at 11:23 am
(This post was last modified: October 20, 2015 at 11:24 am by Crossless2.0.)
(October 20, 2015 at 11:21 am)JBrentonK Wrote:(October 20, 2015 at 11:13 am)Crossless1 Wrote: Agnosticism has nothing to do with belief/non-belief. It concerns itself with knowledge claims.Just pointing this out to you crossless, you are entirely wrong about agnosticism.
Atheism needs to base itself on nothing more than a lack of good evidence that there is a god of any sort. And you continue, through your inability to provide such evidence, to give us all the reason we need on which to base our non-belief.
Do tell, my etymologically challenged chimp. What would be the difference, for example, between a gnostic Christian and an agnostic Christian? Or between an agnostic atheist and a gnostic atheist?
