RE: Blowing Scientists Minds
October 20, 2015 at 4:10 pm
(This post was last modified: October 20, 2015 at 4:10 pm by Alex K.)
(October 20, 2015 at 11:30 am)Blondie Wrote: Not sure if this fits here or what to call it exactly. If this is under the wrong forum or misleading, I apologize ahead of time.Now, do I understand it correctly that you would like to explain the different hominid fossils via several separate and completely independent trees of life? This is exceedingly unlikely. Also, where are these hominids supposed to have come from if there is no evolution? You would have to invoke a devious intelligent designer and magic to recreate the observed fossils and biochemistry, a super complicated and convoluted scenario.
Hypothetically speaking, if the earth is as old as scientists state that it is, what would be the possibility of life existing on earth before what we know as life on earth today? Would this be a possibility? Has the scientific community considered this? Could the possibility of proof exist scientifically? Why or why not? Besides the evolution theory, could this in any way explain the different fossils such as the different shapes of skulls that serve to most scientists as proof of the evolution theory? If this questioning of mine could be proven, how would it change the outlook of science as we know it today?
Quote:What does the big bang have to do with any of this???
If the universe was nothing to start with and the Big Bang happened, then anything like this could be possible unless I am wrong on my thinking. I did try to google this before I asked and not much has showed up.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
