Name the religion Nazi-Germany used to invoke in ruling; now answer that with an honest, serious & realistic academic answer, that if you wanted me to rule your answer as "legit". That's right; NONE.
So there was a new religion in Germany that we're not aware of, that is called "hitler-worshiping" ? you can't be serious.
In practice, ALL the countries since WW2 are secular (fully), since religion is not used in decision making or whatsoever. The U.S played secularism all along, when it favored its interest above Japan's children (nuking it to entitle itself as a superpower); allying itself with Britain to inherit its empire (countries rich in oil like Saudi Arabia), could anything by more secular ? Interest first..
Religious-Like nationalism ? yes it is religious-like. But it is not RELIGION. Remember ? many atheists are nationalists themselves. I'm against any type on nationalism anyways, since it leads to nothing but unilateralism. You can't be a nationalist without being a secular after all; and being a secular means, that when interest demands, engage unilateralism even if the world was burnt to crisp.
However, your point doesn't stand. Simply, believers in the Abrahamic faiths are too much; including Muslims, Christians & Jews. That's why in many wars, you see them. But come on, the wars of Rome (which dominated history) were fought with Abrahamic faiths at the center ?
But when the Mongols attack Asians, who HAPPEN to believe in an Abrahamic faith like Islam, you can't be serious in putting the faith at the center don't you ?
"Something In The News" ? you don't mean the propaganda poop the White House is throwing at you to swallow don't you ? "ze muslims"; that kind of media ? sadly, they don't tell you about the dirty games the west plays in the Middle East for oil; either.
They never show you this :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RM0uvgHKZe8
Come on man..this media you mean ?
For god's sake..
So there was a new religion in Germany that we're not aware of, that is called "hitler-worshiping" ? you can't be serious.
In practice, ALL the countries since WW2 are secular (fully), since religion is not used in decision making or whatsoever. The U.S played secularism all along, when it favored its interest above Japan's children (nuking it to entitle itself as a superpower); allying itself with Britain to inherit its empire (countries rich in oil like Saudi Arabia), could anything by more secular ? Interest first..
Religious-Like nationalism ? yes it is religious-like. But it is not RELIGION. Remember ? many atheists are nationalists themselves. I'm against any type on nationalism anyways, since it leads to nothing but unilateralism. You can't be a nationalist without being a secular after all; and being a secular means, that when interest demands, engage unilateralism even if the world was burnt to crisp.
However, your point doesn't stand. Simply, believers in the Abrahamic faiths are too much; including Muslims, Christians & Jews. That's why in many wars, you see them. But come on, the wars of Rome (which dominated history) were fought with Abrahamic faiths at the center ?
But when the Mongols attack Asians, who HAPPEN to believe in an Abrahamic faith like Islam, you can't be serious in putting the faith at the center don't you ?
"Something In The News" ? you don't mean the propaganda poop the White House is throwing at you to swallow don't you ? "ze muslims"; that kind of media ? sadly, they don't tell you about the dirty games the west plays in the Middle East for oil; either.
They never show you this :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RM0uvgHKZe8
Come on man..this media you mean ?
For god's sake..
