Incase anyone was confused or couldn't be bothered to navigate the word salad the claims made so far are this;
The name Jesus means Yahweh, God.
Jesus is Gods son, Jesus is God.
For reasons not specified "Sophocles Euripides and Aristophanes are also the sons of God, and I know a little about the origins of the family."
Also for reasons not specified "my name comes out pronounced as Christ".
So, lets follow the trail of breadcrumbs we have been left;
Sophocles, Euripides and Artisophanes are apparantly sons of God so going by the Jesus example this means they *are* God.
Furthermore the OP feels a need to point out he doesn't know the origins of his family so presumably hes implying he might be related and the whole "I am God" thing is hereditary.
Therefore it would mean hes a descendant of Jesus, Sophocles, Euripides and Artisophanes who, going by the theory, would have to all be related to each other.
Alright, so. Based on this the OP must draw the conclusion he is also a son of God and by the rules set; he is God.
You with me so far? No? Don't worry about it, press on.
Ok, so. The OP must assume several things for all of this to be true;
1. Gods and sons of Gods are the same people.
2. Being God is hereditary.
3. Several historical figures were God.
4. The OP is related to four major historical figures.
5. The OP is a God.
Exciting conclusions based on analysis of OPs claims;
1. The claims are provable as all we would have to do is follow the thread of the OPs genetics and see if it leads us back to ancient greece and eventually further back to Jerusalem.
2. God is not omnipotent, because the OP is not omnipotent. That would mean Jesus was not omnipotent.
3. God has genes. DNA evidence of Gods existence is possible.
The name Jesus means Yahweh, God.
Jesus is Gods son, Jesus is God.
For reasons not specified "Sophocles Euripides and Aristophanes are also the sons of God, and I know a little about the origins of the family."
Also for reasons not specified "my name comes out pronounced as Christ".
So, lets follow the trail of breadcrumbs we have been left;
Sophocles, Euripides and Artisophanes are apparantly sons of God so going by the Jesus example this means they *are* God.
Furthermore the OP feels a need to point out he doesn't know the origins of his family so presumably hes implying he might be related and the whole "I am God" thing is hereditary.
Therefore it would mean hes a descendant of Jesus, Sophocles, Euripides and Artisophanes who, going by the theory, would have to all be related to each other.
Alright, so. Based on this the OP must draw the conclusion he is also a son of God and by the rules set; he is God.
You with me so far? No? Don't worry about it, press on.
Ok, so. The OP must assume several things for all of this to be true;
1. Gods and sons of Gods are the same people.
2. Being God is hereditary.
3. Several historical figures were God.
4. The OP is related to four major historical figures.
5. The OP is a God.
Exciting conclusions based on analysis of OPs claims;
1. The claims are provable as all we would have to do is follow the thread of the OPs genetics and see if it leads us back to ancient greece and eventually further back to Jerusalem.
2. God is not omnipotent, because the OP is not omnipotent. That would mean Jesus was not omnipotent.
3. God has genes. DNA evidence of Gods existence is possible.
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
- Abdul Alhazred.
