RE: Why the "There are so many interpretations of the Bible" claim is confused
October 31, 2015 at 10:52 pm
(October 28, 2015 at 12:03 am)Rhythm Wrote:(October 27, 2015 at 10:55 pm)Delicate Wrote: Are you sure you're remembering things correctly?
What is the relevant difference between Catholics and Protestants on baptism that is not a matter of preference or practice?
Already been covered, I won't be repeating myself. Are you done?
Don't have to repeat yourself, but you could point to where you talked about it before.
Odds are, you didn't though.
(October 27, 2015 at 10:50 pm)Thena323 Wrote:(October 27, 2015 at 10:07 pm)Delicate Wrote: Granted. Perhaps I did adjust my challenge as I thought about the issue further.
Which particular adjustment was unjustified?
It's not a matter of a particular adjustment being justified or unjustified. It's a matter of you creating an unfair scenario in which you can never be demonstrated to be incorrect.
The general tone of your posts suggests that it's being done deliberately.
Every adjustment was predicated on a clearer understanding of what exactly atheists are trying to say, and what criteria need to be logically met in order for the claim to be true.
The adjustments were fair, not unfair. If you disagree, show me some evidence.
In other words, put up or shut up.
