Why the "There are so many interpretations of the Bible" claim is confused

[Delicate]

Don't have to repeat yourself, but you could point to where you talked about it before.

Odds are, you didn't though.


Every adjustment was predicated on a clearer understanding of what exactly atheists are trying to say, and what criteria need to be logically met in order for the claim to be true. 

The adjustments were fair, not unfair. If you disagree, show me some evidence.

In other words, put up or shut up.

Your requirement for evidence here  is a striking example of a double-standard.

I find atheists to be fantastic asserters of claims, but terrible supporters of said claims.

Yours is a classic example. Confident assertion, no support. In other words, no explanation of why an intelligent person would believe you.