RE: Christians - even the Bible says that Jesus was not God so why do you say he was ?
November 3, 2015 at 2:07 am
(November 3, 2015 at 12:30 am)heatiosrs Wrote: You really like to pick and choose what you read don't you, it explains your attraction to the bible.
I had my friend read over it to make sure it wasn't too confusing to understand. Regardless, i'm convinced that you are willingly trying not to understand it, or do, and are responding with something unrelated in attempt to change the subject/prevent me from further countering your point[Which was clearly in what I quoted you] so that I don't simplify, or admit I don't know how to in this circumstance and you can claim you "don't understand".
I'm honestly just done arguing with you on any part of the forums. You continue, and start, arguments regardless of whether or not you can contribute anything useful to them. You never concede any points, at least not in what i've seen, and my suspicion is that anytime you feel you are proven wrong you stop responding/change the subject, never giving anyone any credit for taking time to analyze your point of view and prove it wrong in a civilized manner. One of my friends said you were really nice, true may it be, I can't stand you, it's the most annoying thing in the world to keep trying to take your POV in to consideration when you constantly try purposefully to not understand what someone says, considering the fact that everyone on this forum has to try their very hardest just to understand what you are saying.
Forget it, I could say more but I don't want to. Concede my point, prove it wrong, or move on. Just don't say it's confusing when you skim through it while half-reading. If you were an intellectual you would at the very least say what parts you are confused on, or write down what you think the person said for clarification or correction. Never have I ever seen any respectable, intelligent person, in a response to someone challenge their views say; "I'm confused, explain it better", and act like that deserves a response, or that the argument was even addressed in any way shape or form.
If you aren't going to respect my time, and my views, don't expect me to respect yours. It's quite insulting I spent 20 minutes writing that, rewriting it and correcting in the process, and as well even went back to correct it some more, and you just say "Too confusing, write it simpler".
Oh and for the;
"What are you referring to?"
Use your brain, do you think I quoted you for no reason, or are you just admitting that your original point shouldn't be considered or taken seriously as it didn't provide any substance worth referring to?
I'll take either one to be honest, they both define the laughable simplicity and self centered-bias your posts behold.
Um, Jenny's not a Christian, Heat... so maybe you should pause for a bit of personal introspection, eh?
Also, I'm an atheist, and I don't disagree with a word she said, regarding your post. It was poorly formatted word salad (as even you admitted), and just doesn't scan well. I have a 158 IQ and an off-the-chart score in verbal comprehension on every test of the subject I've ever taken, and even I had to do a triple-take to figure out what you were trying to say.
So again, take a chill pill and rephrase or STFU. But by all means, do not continue to abuse Jenny simply because she tried to point out to you that your writing style sucks, no matter what your friend tells you.
Whatever point you had in there is obfuscated by your poor writing, and it's not our job to detangle your poor encoding skills, as the audience to whom you are trying to communicate your intended meaning.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.