Why teach Creationism over Science

[Captain Scarlet]

It bugs me that im always hearing about people wanting to teach creationism in place of science. First of all it is false. Second it is not even taught as a science in church it is taught in the same way they teach history. They dont try to teach you how things work they just lay out a series of events for you. So them replacing science with creationism is like replacing science with american history.

Those who advocate teaching creation aren't opposing science, we are opposing the theory of evolution and the claim that it has been scientifically proved to be true. Here is a site that shows that creation can be supported scientifically:

http://www.answersingenesis.org/

You have to be either lying or joking. If the former I suggest you pray for forgiveness.

Move over Ken Miller, Steven Gould (sadly expired), Richard Dawkins and welcome Duane Gish, Ray Comfort, Kent Hovind (sadly none of which have expired). This lie has been roundly defeated in US courts twice now and has never nor ever will come to trial in Europe. If you want to be ignorant thats fine, but you can't be happy to others are ignorant too (including children); shame on you and your kind sir!