(November 9, 2015 at 10:50 am)Drich Wrote:(November 8, 2015 at 10:35 am)Rhondazvous Wrote: Drippy's standard for what constitutes evidence is somewhat below sea level.
I've got 4 very well known historical all who claim to know of/ have been to the site, and they describe what was there. I also have historical record of Alexander the Great clearing the site and trying to rebuild.. ALL from non biblical sources...
Do you even know/understand what constitutes as evidence in that time frame?
Let's assume that you have established the existence of the tower referred to in the story. Do you maintain that the just-so story found in Genesis is in all respects historically accurate, or are you willing to concede a distinction between the existence of the tower (ziggurat) and the Hebrew etiology about it? If not, on what basis -- other than "I really, really believe the Bible" -- do you not make the distinction?
