RE: Judge orders child removed from Lesbian couple's care
November 13, 2015 at 3:07 am
(This post was last modified: November 13, 2015 at 3:08 am by robvalue.)
Let me see if I understand this logic:
Because a child is generally better off with their biological parents, and because the biological parents will be a man and a woman, that means the replacement parents should also be a man and a woman, even though they no longer possess the crucial quality of actually being the biological parents.
Or the alternative: never take a child away from its biological parents, because "in general" it's better off there. Still doesn't work for children whose parents fall ill or die and literally can't care for their children.
Because a child is generally better off with their biological parents, and because the biological parents will be a man and a woman, that means the replacement parents should also be a man and a woman, even though they no longer possess the crucial quality of actually being the biological parents.
Or the alternative: never take a child away from its biological parents, because "in general" it's better off there. Still doesn't work for children whose parents fall ill or die and literally can't care for their children.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum