Yes, but the problem Thunderf00t has is when he goes offbeat and tries to talk about things other than science. He also likes to brag about how he is a supporter of free speech, and yet rarely answers any of his critics.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 17, 2026, 8:59 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Great Defense of Scientific Naturalism
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Great Defense of Scientific Naturalism - by Justtristo - January 1, 2011 at 4:36 am
RE: Great Defense of Scientific Naturalism - by HeyItsZeus - January 1, 2011 at 5:00 pm
RE: Great Defense of Scientific Naturalism - by TheDarkestOfAngels - January 1, 2011 at 5:54 pm
RE: Great Defense of Scientific Naturalism - by Tiberius - January 1, 2011 at 6:37 pm
RE: Great Defense of Scientific Naturalism - by TheDarkestOfAngels - January 1, 2011 at 7:14 pm
RE: Great Defense of Scientific Naturalism - by Tiberius - January 1, 2011 at 8:11 pm
RE: Great Defense of Scientific Naturalism - by TheDarkestOfAngels - January 1, 2011 at 9:23 pm
RE: Great Defense of Scientific Naturalism - by Edwardo Piet - January 2, 2011 at 8:43 am
RE: Great Defense of Scientific Naturalism - by Autumnlicious - January 2, 2011 at 12:02 am
RE: Great Defense of Scientific Naturalism - by HeyItsZeus - January 3, 2011 at 10:15 pm
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
