(December 6, 2015 at 1:25 pm)DespondentFishdeathMasochismo Wrote:(December 6, 2015 at 12:22 pm)Sappho Wrote: Not really, since the my question isn't about the source of it, which I already tried to answer in my describtion, but rather what the result of that is.Reading this is just
It also pends whether any confiction is pure subjective in every way, opposed to what some people like to believe. If you think not, then let's include that now
A reason why I'm interested in this (not that I don't have my own answer, but I would like to hear others and above all I love to let people think about things) is for exemple that some people find it hard to be friends (friendly) with let's say a murderer, while I only look at how they are inside rather than their actions or even ideas.We've all seen the "if there was no god there wouldn't be morality" argument posed so many times. It's annoying that you're obviously asking a loaded question, no one wants to have an argument with someone so poorly worded and redundant. It's not interesting, it's just headache inducing, and a waste of time. If you're so convinced you have the answer to the question, there's no point in having the argument.
Also, what's with this little condescending smiley face you always use? Are you just trying to subtly say "haha I hold all the answers, stupid atheists"? Your deceit just emanates from you.
What if you try to read the question properly instead of getting mad?
Also, the argument ad hominem doesn't suit you well. yeah, let's all just mock the guy for who English is a foreign language instead of actually saying something usefull, which is the whole damn point of the thread. Yes, I have my own opinion on it, but can't we just talk about it together, and maybe in a nice way?
The smileyface is because I was glad I found a new interesting question to add. I'm an atheist, just like you, but the difference seems that I like to discuss things without immediatly taking a definitif stand?
whatever floats your goat
