My question is what the fuck people are so concerned with there being a "universal moral law" for if people apparently break it all the damn time.
If this is the result of a "Universal moral law", i'd like to see the result without one, couldn't get much worse.
Also if there is a universal moral law, and people disagree on what it is without consequence, then there is no more law. You can't have a moral law with the traits being that it's; Unidentifiable, Inconsequential, and Undefinable. That's just bullshit, man.
If this is the result of a "Universal moral law", i'd like to see the result without one, couldn't get much worse.
Also if there is a universal moral law, and people disagree on what it is without consequence, then there is no more law. You can't have a moral law with the traits being that it's; Unidentifiable, Inconsequential, and Undefinable. That's just bullshit, man.
Which is better:
To die with ignorance, or to live with intelligence?
Truth doesn't accommodate to personal opinions.
The choice is yours.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is God and there is man, it's only a matter of who created whom
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The more questions you ask, the more you realize that disagreement is inevitable, and communication of this disagreement, irrelevant.
