(December 12, 2015 at 5:21 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Typical. Shits on the boards and then refuses to follow through, preferring instead to get others to elaborate. The answer to your question is simple. If you can claim it's possible without elaboration, anyone else can claim it's impossible without elaboration..and the modal form cuts both ways - as has already been lain out for you in this thread.
The ontological argument -for- god proves gods existence just as competently as the ontological argument -against- god proves that god doesn't exist......which is made using the same language and structure.
Bingo