(December 12, 2015 at 5:21 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Typical. Shits on the boards and then refuses to follow through, preferring instead to get others to elaborate. The answer to your question is simple. If you can claim it's possible without elaboration, anyone else can claim it's impossible without elaboration..and the modal form cuts both ways - as has already been lain out for you in this thread.
The ontological argument -for- god proves gods existence just as competently as the ontological argument -against- god proves that god doesn't exist......which is made using the same language and structure.
WTF is your problem? Did you even read the OP?
I said this is new to me and that I wanted to discuss it. I did not say I wanted to defend it. I did not say I thought it was true.
If you'd like to provide some intelligent commentary to help me and others to understand why the argument fails, great.
Otherwise, if you don't want to discuss the argument, just ignore me or the thread.
