Well, I've been wandering around the web and in the course of my travels, I came across an article by Dr. Edward Feser, a Christian philosopher (and former atheist), which explains some of the weaknesses contained in Plantinga's version of the Ontological Argument. Plantinga himself, apparently, conceded that a rational person need not accept the argument. He only claimed that a rational person could accept it.
That's not much of an argument if you ask me. If the believers don't even buy it, there's no reason anyone else should.
Time to move on.
Thanks for all who participated in the discussion.
That's not much of an argument if you ask me. If the believers don't even buy it, there's no reason anyone else should.
Time to move on.
Thanks for all who participated in the discussion.