(December 16, 2015 at 5:05 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote:(December 16, 2015 at 4:56 pm)Delicate Wrote: False. You've failed to comprehend the argument. The argument isn't just talking about some things, it talks about propositions specifically, and the widely held idea (held by many atheist philosophers) is that propositions depend on minds.
You are an idiot. Really.
I'm not even going to bother responding to the rest. How can I take an idiot like you seriously after you don't even know how to read?
I made an 800 on the critical reading portion of the SAT and a 35 (out of 36) on the reading portion of the ACT when I was 17, so I'm fairly certain that it was not a failure of reading comprehension on my part. The arguments there are, simply, bad. I'm sorry you think those are good arguments; I would acknowledge them if they were, but truly, they're not-- those are comedy fodder to any philosophy professor on the planet, as Dr. Fuzzy already noted. Hurling insults my way doesn't change that.
But please, tell me more about how I'm stupid.
Between taking those tests and today, did you hit your head at some time?
How else can you expect to mischaracterize an argument so badly?
