(December 16, 2015 at 5:27 pm)Whateverist the White Wrote:(December 16, 2015 at 3:11 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Since none of you have a clue about how to interpret the term ‘maximally great being’ your objections to the ontological argument are just noise.
But aren't you assuming there is a sensible way to interpret ‘maximally great being’ which will have the persuasive force you think it will? More likely, there isn't.
I am assuming that a sensible person must have some understanding of the history of terms use before daring to critique them.