RE: The Not-so-elephant In The Room
December 18, 2015 at 8:58 am
(This post was last modified: December 18, 2015 at 8:59 am by Catholic_Lady.)
(December 18, 2015 at 12:50 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(December 13, 2015 at 4:43 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Here's some info on the belief:
They are still in the shape of bread and wine, but we do believe that Jesus is present within them.
Well, that's not what the Catechism says. It says that there is a change in the substance -- "transubstantiation". Your quote cites CCC 1736 as if it's relevant, but it isn't, if you'll do yourself the favor of reading it.
This quote compares the doctrine of wine changing into blood -- physically, according to Catechism -- to a child changing into an adult. The comparison is clearly faulty, for while children, so long as they are nurtured indeed grow into adults, wine, no matter how long it is prayed-over, will never change into the blood of a man. You appeal to a meaningless spirituo-theological definition of "substance" in this special pleading of yours, but the fact is, your Catholic Catechism makes no such claim, distinguishes no such nuance. It simply states that the wafers turn into the substance of flesh -- they take on that material form. The wine turns to blood.
The quote you've provided is a combination of semantics and appeals to authority that carry no weight. These bishops can redefine substance as "deepest reality" (whatever that horseshit means!), but the fact is, they did not write the Catechism. The authors of the Catechism left no doubt in their words that they thought of transubstantiation as a physical thing.
I don't know what else to tell you. The Catechism uses the term "substance matter." What I posted above explains exactly what is meant by "substance matter." The Catechism and the link to the Conference of Catholic Bishops are not at all in opposition. It just doesn't happen to be what you think is meant by it. Here is where it specifically addresses substance matter and what the Church means by it:
Quote: In the Church's traditional theological language, in the act of consecration during the Eucharist the "substance" of the bread and wine is changed by the power of the Holy Spirit into the "substance" of the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ. At the same time, the "accidents" or appearances of bread and wine remain. "Substance" and "accident" are here used as philosophical terms that have been adapted by great medieval theologians such as St. Thomas Aquinas in their efforts to understand and explain the faith. Such terms are used to convey the fact that what appears to be bread and wine in every way (at the level of "accidents" or physical attributes - that is, what can be seen, touched, tasted, or measured) in fact is now the Body and Blood of Christ (at the level of "substance" or deepest reality).
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh