(December 20, 2015 at 1:44 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: How is she not? She's voted for every war ever presented to her, has always perused an aggressive foreign policy and her husbands regime were partial responsible for sanctions that killed hundreds of thousands of people. War monger is being nice. If the world were just, she would be tried for war crimes.
By every war presented to her to vote on, you mean the Iraq War. The only war that she had a chance to vote for as a Senator. Okay. I disagreed with that war, and the results, in hindsight, proved Bernie right. (Which is one of the reasons I want Bernie to win).
It's stupid to attribute Bill's presidential decisions to Hillary. So I won't even address that.
Pursuing an aggressive foreign policy is the default position. Even Bernie will have an aggressive foreign policy. Going after ISIL and postponing regime change until after you accomplish that is still an aggressive foreign policy. Every politician running for President should be tried for this nebulous "war crimes" by your definition.
Would you care to be specific? What war crimes would you charge Hillary with?
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
