(December 18, 2015 at 1:29 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(December 15, 2015 at 11:22 pm)Delicate Wrote: The "credible" part leaves room for these intellectually dishonest conmen to move the goalposts. You won't see a prior, coherent, rigorous definition of credible from them, which they will consistently apply to their claims.
You won't see a prior definition of "god" that makes sense from theists, yet you're not complaining about that. If you care this much about intellectual honesty, perhaps you should show some yourself.
I'm not complaining because it's not true.
The definitions of God I've seen taken seriously are perfectly coherent. What makes you think they make no sense might be a cognitive disability on your part, not a problem with the definition.
Just sayin'.
PS- If you want to defend your claim, you're welcome to demonstrate how a philosophically-informed definition of God makes no sense.
