Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 11, 2025, 6:01 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
When Atheists Can't Think Episode 1: No Evidence for God?
RE: When Atheists Can't Think Episode 1: No Evidence for God?
(December 23, 2015 at 7:21 pm)AAA Wrote:
(December 23, 2015 at 6:47 pm)Beccs Wrote: The appendix is vestigial and likely adapted in its function as humans evolved.  Yes, it likely may serve a minor function in that it stores healthy bacteria and plays a part in the immune system.  That is still being debated by medical researchers.

We likely shed our ability to breathe underwater because such a function was no longer needed as we spent more and more time out of the water and became a fully land based mammal.  Why keep a function we would barely use?

And, I won't say that if we *were* designed then that design was evil.  But it was certainly incompetent.
Ok, well if we agree it has a function, then why are you still calling it vestigial? 

"Why keep a function we would barely use?" Why would we lose a function that we sometimes would use? I understand why we would lose our ability to breathe underwater, but it was more of a point to the other person who was wondering why we don't have the ability to restore limbs.

I don't think the design is incompetent, I think that people just say that because they think it makes them seem smarter, like they could do a better job. As though all the engineers who ever lived could have done a better job if they all got together.

Note the usage of the term "it likely serves a minor function".  At this stage that's still uncertain.  And, it's certainly not a vital organ even IF it serves such a function.  Hence, vestigial until proven to still serve a function.

Why would we keep a function that we don't use or MAY use rarely?

Why do people defend a supposedly "all powerful, all knowing designer" when it's clear to anyone with a basic knowledge of evolution that the "design" of the human animal is flawed at best?  I think they do it just so they can appear smart to themselves or others with the same level of understanding.

Could humans design a better human?  At this stage, with our limited knowledge, no.  But there are breakthroughs in the fields of medical science, biology, and genetic engineering virtually every other week.  Hell, I just got back from a conference that brought to our attention the latest breakthroughs in my professional field and some future developments that my professors would have said was science fiction only a few years back.

Watch this space.

However, the flaws in the "design" of the human animal fit perfectly with the evolutionary models we have.

Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: When Atheists Can't Think Episode 1: No Evidence for God? - by The Valkyrie - December 23, 2015 at 7:49 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Atheists, how can you say there is no God. When... Urani9 30 1352 December 12, 2024 at 11:39 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  Are Atheists Afraid to Join Atheists? Asmodeus 10 956 October 26, 2024 at 9:09 am
Last Post: Asmodeus
  Veridical NDEs: Evidence/Proof of the Soul and the After-Life? Nishant Xavier 34 3418 July 17, 2024 at 7:34 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Do you think Atheists are stupid? Authari 121 10085 January 4, 2024 at 7:35 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Do you think God is authoritarian? ShinyCrystals 65 5696 December 9, 2023 at 7:08 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  The Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Nishant Xavier 38 4230 August 7, 2023 at 10:24 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  When were the Gospels Written? The External and Internal Evidence. Nishant Xavier 62 5340 August 6, 2023 at 10:25 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Isaiah 53, 700 B.C: Historical Evidence of the Divine Omniscience. Nishant Xavier 91 7489 August 6, 2023 at 2:19 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God. Nishant Xavier 162 15374 July 9, 2023 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Deesse23
  Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning. Nishant Xavier 54 4824 July 8, 2023 at 8:23 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah



Users browsing this thread: 11 Guest(s)