(December 24, 2015 at 1:09 am)Delicate Wrote:(December 24, 2015 at 12:34 am)Goosebump Wrote: Isn't the "JTB" the Gettier problem? If so doesn't that mean that it's "true but unknown"? How is that provable or even usable in any argument? Atheists don't say there is "No God" they simply say there "Is not Your God". I think your entire reasoning is false because your making some assumption.
It isn't. The Gettier problem attacks JTB. To be more specific, the Gettier problem attacks the claim that JTB is N&S for knowledge. Given Gettier (and other) problems with the JTB account, I think most epistemologists today take JTB to be N&~S for knowledge.
Thanks for the clarification. I looked up the "JTB" Theory. If what I looked up is true it's the Plato theory of knowledge. IF that's the case that doesn't your argument still possess a problem. Meaning your used it incorrectly?
S believes P... and P is true... Atheists don't "believe" anything. So how is that argument applicable?
Thanks again for the clarification.
"I'm thick." - Me