(December 24, 2015 at 1:21 am)Goosebump Wrote:(December 24, 2015 at 1:09 am)Delicate Wrote: It isn't. The Gettier problem attacks JTB. To be more specific, the Gettier problem attacks the claim that JTB is N&S for knowledge. Given Gettier (and other) problems with the JTB account, I think most epistemologists today take JTB to be N&~S for knowledge.
Thanks for the clarification. I looked up the "JTB" Theory. If what I looked up is true it's the Plato theory of knowledge. IF that's the case that doesn't your argument still possess a problem. Meaning your used it incorrectly?
S believes P... and P is true... Atheists don't "believe" anything. So how is that argument applicable?
Thanks again for the clarification.
I think you have something confused. Let's start from the beginning.
Atheists here combine two mutually exclusive views into one (agnostic atheist).
They justify this by saying "agnostic refers to their knowledge, while atheist refers to their belief".
JTB (which at least one atheist here seems to affirm) says JTB = knowledge.